Eva Gunasekera was the Senior Counsel for Health Care Fraud at the United States Department of Justice, the Office that supervises all False Claims Act cases in all 94 United States District Courts. In this role, she analyzed complex health care data sets, including Medicare and Medicaid payment data and trends, to identify potentially fraudulent practices in the health care space. Ms. Gunasekera is a long-time go-to qui tam attorney for uncovering and proving health care fraud schemes in the Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, VA and FEHBP programs. She now represents whistleblowers in all 94 United States District Courts.
She is uniquely skilled at getting a whistleblower’s case precisely the right attention at the Justice Department and other agencies. Her investigations have involved parallel criminal proceedings at the Justice Department and studying the compliance and whistleblower programs of health care organizations, including those subjected to Corporate Integrity Agreements and oversight by Independent Review Organizations, as required by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG).
Ms. Gunasekera has enforced anti-fraud laws and represented whistleblowers across industries: pharmaceutical and device manufacturers, health care providers, hospitals, physicians, physician groups, laboratories, managed care, pharmacies, hospice and nursing home providers, home health, financial institutions, government suppliers, small businesses, automotive and defense contractors. Her deep health care fraud expertise includes these laws and programs:
Ms. Gunasekera is also a former member of the Justice Department-appointed Independent Corporate Compliance Monitor and Auditor for Volkswagen under its several-year Plea Agreement and Consent Decree with the United States Department of Justice.
Prior to joining the Justice Department, Ms. Gunasekera worked in private practice at two international law firms where she handled complex commercial litigation, administrative trials and pro bono work representing an individual seeking asylum and as a guardian ad litem.
Ms. Gunasekera handled cases that involved violations of the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law and all federal health care programs (Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, FEHB):
The Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of a relator, giving new life to their False Claims Act lawsuit and overturning the prior decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington to dismiss the case. The relator, UPPI LLC, an association of highly specialized small business nuclear pharmacies, has accused healthcare company Cardinal Health and several “small business front companies” of engaging in a deceptive “rent-a-vet” scheme. This scheme involves exploiting government preferences for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) in contracting.
The District Court initially dismissed the case for failure to plead falsity and materiality. However, the Ninth Circuit found that the relator’s First Amended Complaint (FAC) presented viable theories of liability, including “promissory fraud” where defendants make false promises to perform as SDVOSB subcontractors without any intention of fulfilling the contract.
Represented two directors of nursing whistleblowers in a False Claims Act qui tam case against a national home healthcare provider. The case settled allegations that the home healthcare provider received Medicare dollars for patients for home health care services that were not provided or not medically necessary; and for paying kickbacks to doctors for patient referrals. The home healthcare company sold its assets to a third party and paid $2.1 million to the government. Our clients received a 17% whistleblower reward.
Represented two pharmacist whistleblowers in a False Claims Act qui tam case against an online pharmacy that settled allegations that it prematurely dispensed insulin pen refills to patients, causing Medicare and Medicaid programs to pay more than they should have paid for unprescribed and unusable insulin. The online pharmacy paid $5.7 million and our clients received a 21% whistleblower reward. Further, the online pharmacy admitted to these allegations in the settlement.
The United States Department of Justice announced a False Claims Act settlement with a health care provider in Georgia. Under the terms of the settlement, the health care provider paid $130,000 to the United States and the state of Georgia. As a result of this settlement, an individual physician affiliated with this health care provider will be excluded for ten years from participation in all federal healthcare programs. Tycko & Zavareei LLP in partnership with Finch McCranie, LLP represented the whistleblower, who received $26,000 for reporting the conduct to the government.
Allegations: Defendant North Georgia HealthCare Center Inc., a Federally Qualified Health Center and taxpayer-supported health care provider, prescribed addictive opioids to patients who did not need them.
False Claims Act qui tam case against a Federally Qualified Health Center and taxpayer-supported health care provider that settled allegations that it prescribed addictive opioids to patients who did not need them. The health care provider paid $130,000 and our client received a 20% whistleblower reward. Further, the individual physician who prescribed the opioids was excluded for 10 years from participation in all federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid.
A $300 million False Claims Act settlement, a 5 year Corporate Integrity Agreement, and a criminal guilty plea to obstruction of justice and other charges by a drug company that allegedly illegally marketed several drugs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor drugs or SSRI) with serious side effects that it knew were not approved by the FDA to treat depression in children and adolescents; used high pressure sales tactics with physicians to get them to prescribe these drugs and paid the doctors cash and other kickbacks disguised as grants or consulting fees, expensive meals and lavish entertainment.
A $45 million payment, a 5 year Corporate Integrity Agreement, and a criminal guilty plea by a pharmaceutical manufacturer involving off-label marketing of a steroid drug with dangerous side effects.
A $38 million settlement alleging that a drug company paid kickbacks to physicians to induce them to write drug prescriptions for patients who had heart conditions, fibromyalgia, or dementia.
A $35 million settlement and a guilty plea by a drug company that allegedly misled patients and physicians about the intended uses of a drug designed to treat patients with a rare disorder that negatively impacted their cholesterol levels.
As lead trial counsel on a several-month health care fraud trial in 2015, one of the most complex False Claims Act trials in recent history.
A $26 million settlement involving a Medicare Managed Care contractor that failed to provide required screening, assessment and case management for adults, and children with special health care needs and submitted false data to a cash-strapped state Medicaid program to avoid penalties.
A nearly $20 million settlement involving an oncology provider for alleged fraudulent billing for medically unnecessary urine tests involving bladder cancer and for paying doctors bonuses to order these tests.
A $12 million settlement in just under 9 months—from the filing of the case to settlement—involving a physician and a cancer center that allegedly billed for radiation oncology services that were not medically necessary for the patient, were not properly supervised by doctors, or were upcoded—a practice in which the provider bills for procedures that are paid at a higher rate when, in fact, those procedures were not actually performed.
An $8 million dollar settlement involving a radiology center that allegedly gave patients an intravenous chemical called contrast dye during MRI scans without proper physician supervision and paid doctors kickbacks for referring patients for medical procedures.
A $7 million dollar settlement involving a hospital that allegedly submitted Medicare claims for fraudulent oncology services.
A resolution with a physician and his practice group involving a precedent-setting period of exclusion from participating in the federal health care programs for allegedly performing unnecessary, highly invasive peripheral artery procedures on patients.
Numerous settlements involving hospice companies that allegedly certified patients as terminally ill, thereby preventing them from receiving curative care, and fraudulently submitted inflated Medicare claims on behalf of other patients. The cases resulted in trial, criminal indictments of an executive and other hospice employees, and millions of dollars in recoveries.
Millions of dollars in settlements in cases involving providers, including a large medical center, for alleged fraudulent administration of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)—a sophisticated radiation treatment for specific types of cancer where extreme precision is required to spare patients’ surrounding organs or healthy tissue.
A settlement involving a defense contractor for charging unallowable costs on an army contract related to identity intelligence analysis support services.
Millions of dollars in settlements in cases relating to alleged fraud in the contracting process involving the General Services Administration (GSA) and the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), which undermined the integrity of the government procurement process.